Last month, we ran a poll in AirMiners about our next community discussion topic. I noticed a lot of people voted for "greenwashing and carbon removal". I'm curious to know more about your interest in discussing greenwashing.
As you know, we're on a quest to discover how to remove billion tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2030. I wonder if talking about greenwashing gets us there. We can argue about whether some action is greenwashing or not, whether some corporation doing whatever is greenwashing or not. But what matters is whether the carbon is removed or not.
From my perspective talking about greenwashing seems like a distraction. Stay focused on what matters - are you removing carbon? And if yes, great keep going, and if not, then think about how to get better.
Am I missing something?
I'd appreciate your input on the following questions:Tito
P.S. Good morning from Zurich, Switzerland! I'm here for the Climeworks DAC Summit, working on a secret project to help AirMiners get better at removing carbon. Hit reply if you're here too.
|
I'm on a mission to remove a billion tons of carbon dioxide by 2030. As part of that, I write a weekly newsletter of tangible actions to remove one billion tons of carbon dioxide by 2030.
The purpose of this newsletter is to accelerate carbon removal by speeding up connections, progress, and coordination. It's ideal for people working in carbon removal already or beginners who are excited to dive in and get my perspective. People curious about carbon removal are welcome to sign up and see what sticks.
To read it now before signing up, check out the archive of 100+ updates.
Join 2,500 subscribers and enter your email below.